This is yet another example of Techno-Notice-Ology!
Moonrace
1969 was the year the Americans (supposedly landed on the moon). I am still one of the disbelievers. My argument would be answered if the powers that be, would just send another mission to the moon. It doesn't even have to be manned, with todays modern robotics technology, transmission capabilities and the use of cameras / audio. Why don't they just send up a robotic mission and show us the evidence which must surely still be there? Another Technology Techno-Notice-Ology!
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I am in the 'unsure-anymore' sector. Here's why; There are too many inaccuracies in the moon landing archives that pro-moon landing believers rely on as evidence of the moon landing taking place;
Evidence that shows total newbie mistakes by filmmakers, set designers and photographers of the time that can be spotted by almost any student in those same fields in todays modern times. (Obviously they did not realise or think about the future technologies that would show up, (what can only be described as), their camera fakery and deception).
The believers who believe we actually went to the moon back in 1969, totally refute and disagree with any logic presented to them.
Lets Techno-Notice of Any Logic or Modern Day Known Photographic Facts.
How did those photographic images, taken on the moon, end up with the grid-guide-lines covered over by the photographed images? They are only supposed to be added over the image by the camera. It is simply not possible for it to be under the image or passing-by behind it! It all smacks of evidence tampering and would be thrown out of any courtroom if these images were being used to prove a legal issue.
At the time, little did we know and little did we care. I'm annoyed because I was one of those millions of believers back in the day. Misled and ill informed.
Next, there are the separate locations, shown on the moon landing expeditions, that were actually just filmed in one location but filmed from different angles. This was discovered by measuring and plotting the positions of rocks and marks or contours on the surface. With our modern technology it is just childsplay to spot these errors. Even programs defending the moon landings don't cover this.
Also ask about the technical difficulties. Re- the Van Allen Radiation Belt, which according to measurements and assumptions is deadly to humans. (Of course I don't really know, because the information is literally from the same sources as the moon landing fiasco info). Astronauts would have had to pass through this radiation belt and yet none who went, ever came back with any signs of radiation sickness.
There is a whole plethora of other information, like no crater under the landing capsule, after thousands of pounds of thrust, (10k I believe), were supposed to have been directed on the surface in the landing process.
Even if the landing craft had just floated to the surface, as was another suggestion, it would still have disturbed dust and thrown debris around. What goes up, must come down. There is a gravity on the moon, all-be-it a lot less than ours here on earth, stuff still falls back to the surface. Yet, there is no dust on the landing capsule, nor its landing feet, nor any signs of scatter marks. Too unusual to be believable.
I think this video does a great job to dispel some of the myths surrounding the conspiracy theorists claims of a hoax moon landing, however, they did not cover in detail, nor with any logic explain the effects of radiation and solar-flares. To simply turn a craft and use the underside as a shield seems a bit suspect to me.
On that note alone I have lots of unanswered questions.
- Where does all that extra maneuvering fuel come from, knowing that you only have enough to take off and do little else? You cannot outrun a solar flare!
- How do they program the computer for that eventuality to fly the craft, if they themselves don't know where to fly or orientate to avoid the radiation, so how would the computer know? It had no memory banks of information, and could not hold a program complex enough to fly a moon lander! The on-board computer was little more powerful than a moders pocket calculator!
- How do they know where exactly the danger radiation danger is coming from, they cannot see it, radiation is invisible to the human eye. Plus, radiation detectors, even to this day as far as I understand the technology, cannot tell you which direction it is coming from unless you are actually moving through it? Yes- its coming from the sun, but... Even the lunar surface is full of solar radiation!
- How do they know when the danger is past, the radiation would radiate the outer surface of the craft and appear to be always outside?
- The solar radiation effects radio communications on the earth, even with our atmosphere to protect us, so how would they communicate with earth, or use their own on-board monitoring equipment or navigate?
So its all BS to me. I am still a disbeliever..
Now finally when all that info is disregarded, you are left with another. Also in 1969 we might have witnessed the birth of the internet. If anyone had been taking any notice!
But that's the point isn't it? We Take No-Notice of Technology! That's why I call this blog the Techno-Notice-Ology!
Regina Dugan explains how we missed the birth of the internet, because we were all wrapped up in the Moon Race hype.
Other Techno-Notices' - In this video Regina Dugan tells us of protein-folding in biological structures that took experts in the field of biology, many years to find answers to certain problems.
A computer program was written to train biological engineers on protein folding, that was taken up by more than 300,000 gamers as if it were a math game, or problem solving game. Its all about enabling a community over a platform, so that the 'hive-mind' (I suppose it could be called) can be used to gather information and solve problems.
The gaming community became so good at playing the protein-folding game that they found answers to problems they did not even really understand, (except for in the sense of a game environment), that took the experts 15 years relatively, to arrive at. In aggregate, says Regina, taken together the group or hive-mind become an emerging transformational force in the real physical world, providing cures to real world health issues. But you know what I'm going to say about that? Most won't care or take any notice!
AndyGold.
This was my March 2015 Techno-Notice-Ology!
© AndyGold 2015
